Lord have mercy. Please forgive me for being nasty, but really…what on EARTH were they thinking at Emanuel Ungaro when they decided to fork over millions to have Lindsey Lohan (she of the classless minis and leggings as pants) serve as an “artistic adviser”?
Purportedly, the house wanted to inject some youth into its designs and attract a different demographic. Well, I’d say they accomplished that. With all the pink, red, hearts, and pasties, they’re bound to get the Frederick’s of Hollywood set for sure.
But seriously, I am speechless. In LiLo’s terms, like WTF?
Of ALL the young actresses in the world, they came up with Lindsey Lohan? What about the always stylish Diane Kruger? Or fabulous Camilla Belle? What about Leighton? Hell, even Miley Cyrus has more style and wisdom than LiLo!
What a tragedy. Ungaro went from this in spring 2009…
Photo: Marcio Madeira, style.com.
Photo: Marcio Madeira, style.com.
to this for spring 2010…
Photo: Huffington Post
Photo: Huffington Post
Yes, I can see Lindsey’s influence; very skank instead of swank. The pasties are a dead giveaway of her inclination for a career in adult film. And really, no one is perfect, but why put a model with breast reduction scars in the low-cut, boob-revealing number? Why, why why?
This whole collection/decision/situation is just wrong on so many levels.
You can see industry veteran and “co-designer” Estrella Archs—who has clocked-in at Prada and Nina Ricci in the past— is thrilled to be involved with such talent. It is truly written all over her face.
Photo: REUTERS/Jacky Naegelen
•• Follow G&G through BLOGLOVIN’ | TWITTER | TUMBLR | RSS ••
